I found this link re: 1975
http://www.cftf.com/comments/1975.html
I haven't read it in full yet but it appears to be something useful to add?
i've had some requests for a smaller pdf version of the october 8, 1968 awake!
") that could easily fit as an email attachment.
this pdf version is only 1.4 mb.
I found this link re: 1975
http://www.cftf.com/comments/1975.html
I haven't read it in full yet but it appears to be something useful to add?
ok i think the best way to go about this is make this a david vs goliath issue.
we should email every news outlet/online outlet we can think of.
attach a copy of the email sent and make some bad publicity for pbs.
The cell phone idea isn't a bad one. IF you get them from the back with just hands going up.. no way in knowing who's hand it who's ....
i'm learning my way around the board, i did use the search feature, but i was not able to find what i was looking for exactly.
my question is, at one time jw were taught that jesus was their mediator, then later they were taught that he is not.
what is the current teachings of jesus being mediator?
Thanks for the advise about clearing my browser. That is normally something that I do quiet often, just not that time.
Anyway. JF question got me thinking of ways to ask people the very question. I asked three different people (at different times) and they all responded with the very same bible verse.
Hebrews 12:24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel. They were strong about the first part of the verse being for the new covenant. I think the next question will be who is in that new covenant.
inspired by the thread about a mom wearing pants to the kingdom hall i thought this might be a good way to help many of us to see the absurdity of some of the wts/jw rules "principles" .
i'll post one "rule" a day.
so let's start with the way men have to wear their hair.
To this day, I still don't understand that no facial hair on men.
At my church we go as we want to, even in our PJ's no one cares.
quote: "only this organization functions for jehovah's purpose and to his praise.
to it alone god's sacred word, the bible, is not a sealed book.
" the watchtower; july 1, 1973, pp.
Quote: "Only this organization functions for Jehovah's purpose and to his praise. To it alone God's Sacred Word, the Bible, is not a sealed book." The Watchtower; July 1, 1973, pp. 402.
What does the WT mean that the bible is not a sealed book?
i have a handful of friends that are still dubs.
we have very little social contact, but i do get the occasional invite over or for golf, and they will still come over.
i may have mussed that up by not going.
just for a heads up so I'll be in the know of what is going on... the special talk; what will it be about?
hey everyone, get this.
i don't know if they know or not but another member (jesus freak) uses the same library that i do!
how i found it out.
No reason to hide. If I see the lady again maybe I'll say hi.
In the mean time, I'll say it now. "Hello lady"
hey everyone, get this.
i don't know if they know or not but another member (jesus freak) uses the same library that i do!
how i found it out.
Hey everyone, Get this. I don't know if they know or not but another member (Jesus Freak) uses the same library that I do! How I found it out. I was asked if I would mind leaving my computer for a few minutes. I said not at all and I closed out (and signed out of my computer login) so I know the page wasn't left openned this time. I walked to my car and realized that I forgot my folder. There was another lady sitting there, logging into the site. I quietly reached around and grabbed my folder and that is when I noticed her log on. I didn't say anything and she did not say anything to me. If i see her next time, maybe I'll say something.
i just did some searching and found one thing about cease-and-desist letters.
basically, they're not legally binding, but a threat of legal action.
now, for e-mail, the source of the message can be easily manipulated and falsified.
If it is NOT from the knocking people then the WTS or someone is in trouble for sending out an e-mail using their name.
I would check into it.
So.. they have someone checking for copyrighted material of the WT? I'm thinking of putting a webpage up then.. lol that may take some time.
this notice was emailed to a third party who embeds watchtower comments videos on his blog:.
"my name is tom shepard, co-producer and co-director of knocking, a documentary about jehovah's witnesses.
you have violated u.s. copyright law by not gaining permission to use footage from knocking in the opening sequence of your series of short videos "watchtower comments" archived at the url: http://jehovahswitnessesvideo.blogspot.com/2008_03_01_archive.html .
I'm begining to see/ believe that it is fake. A mehtod to try to scare you into removing it. A real notice would have included a phone number to contact their people. It would have also included an address a postal address at that. Also, NO attorney says "Please respond to this e-mail"
People do not conduct legal matters through e-mail.